Sports Handicapping and Money Management
Sports Handicapping and Money Management – Part 2
Financial Management uses a higher investment principle to hold a percentage of available funds as opposed to a
fixed dollar rate. In Disability Sports and Financial Management – Part 1, we reviewed the “Gaming System” and
highlighted its shortcomings. The percentage of gambling games is a preferred method for sports professionals and
traders, which is the subject of this article.
Some “benefits” attempt to reconcile conflicting theories by advising that a fixed amount of the original bankroll
percentage be paid in games until the total amount is increased or decreased to a certain level (50%, e.g.), where the
flat rate is calculated again from the set percentage of the new bankroll currency.
Sports Handicapping and Money Management – Part 2
This is only a small improvement in the aforementioned gambling game because after the first game is won or lost in
such cases, there is a clear chance of gambling by percent lost. The natural tendency for flat gambling (rising by a
very high percentage causes money to be lost, and an increasing amount of low percentage of cash won) is forced to
work. The unrealistic rate increases only until static percentages are finally calculated on the new bankroll and not in
days, weeks or months.
Sports Handicapping and Money Management – Part 2
Since percentage gambling is clearly superior to flat gambling operations, it is best to finance a fixed percentage of
the bankroll before each wager to avoid the misuse of the gambling strategy for many games.
Once we have established a higher percentage than any other type of gaming console, attention becomes one to see
what percentage is appropriate and whether it will vary from game to game. in the game.
Many traders are right in thinking that a win over 52.5% (a break and a point due to the “power” of 10% of the
gamebook) will ultimately return profits regardless of what percentage of the bankroll is invested, as long as it is
used consistently and consistently, and that with a better winning percentage of more than 52.5% a rising percentage
of bankroll wagered will generate a significant increase in profits. The potential financial risks of this misconception
can be illustrated by the following hypothetical game model:
CHOOSE Your Percentage
Sports Handicapping and Money Management – Part 2
Two friends enter the casino and are fascinated by a new card game called “Choose your Percent”. The game has a
dealer who takes one card and looks at it at the same time, while the players gamble on each card.
To play, each bettor simply has to announce the starting bankroll and what percentage of his or her bankroll will be
drawn on each card. All 10, face cards, and aces are the winners of the house while the cards numbered 2-9 are the
winners; thus, out of 52 gambling opportunities, players will be guaranteed to win 32 against only 20 losers for a 61.5% winning chance.
The dignitaries sit at a table to play on the upper floor. The first man advertises the first $ 1000 bankroll and bets 25%
of the bankroll on each card. The second investor also announced starting a $ 1000 bank but said he would risk 50%
of his bankroll on each card, assuming he would at least double his friend’s salary.
Sports Handicapping and Money Management – Part 2
After the dealer has finished boarding the floor, the bettor risks 25% of his bankroll on each card and completes the
game more than $ 4000 times. A person who risks 50% of his bankroll with each card lost more than half of his
original $ 1000 bankroll and ended the game with more than $ 400. This, even though 2 dealers are still gambling
with ‘as they open one by one.
What happened?!
What 50% of the bankroll bettor (and the average sports bet) does not understand is that for a large return on any
gambling list there is a fair percentage of bankroll that should be at risk. While there are more winners than losers,
betting more than the “number” will result in a net loss. PRO INFO SPORTS called this appropriate person
a “CAPITAL LETTER” or “PPP”. The sequence of winners and losers in card games or even games does not affect the
